“I can’t tell you the stress of living on the edge, just wondering, ‘Am I going to get sick?'” she said in an interview at the Broadway Railroad Café, where fried catfish with hush puppies is a popular feature. “I feel embarrassed, almost, when I go to the doctors and tell them I don’t have insurance.”
Many people in and around this economically depressed town can’t afford insurance, even as the battered economy has made it harder for employers to provide coverage for workers. They’re looking to Washington for help, and Ross, a conservative Democrat with a strong voice in the debate over health care legislation, says he’s on their side.
Yet Ross stands ready to try to block passage of a House bill that, its supporters say, would provide exactly what Arkansas needs: guaranteed insurance and a wider choice of coverage at competitive prices.
Ross’ position reflects the conundrum confronting many lawmakers, including many he helps lead as head of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition’s health task force. Even if large numbers of constituents might benefit, many of the Blue Dogs generally oppose the $1 trillion bill because they say it’s too costly and doesn’t solve other health care problems in the their mostly rural districts.
“What we’re talking about is containing the cost, slowing the rate of growth of health care down where it can grow at the rate of inflation,” Ross said in an interview, “because if we don’t, it’s going to bankrupt this country.”
Unless changes are made, Ross and six other Blue Dog members of the Energy and Commerce Committee say they’ll vote against the bill this week, bucking party leaders eager for House passage by the end of July. In the hard bargaining taking place, the Blue Dogs are demanding guarantees that the legislation won’t add to the federal budget deficit and would protect small businesses in their districts from employer mandates that would drive up their operating costs.
Yet at the same time, the Blue Dogs also are seeking changes in the way rural hospitals and doctors are reimbursed for their services, which could substantially drive up Medicare and Medicaid expenditures.
Competing Pressures
As is often the case in congressional negotiations of this sort, overarching budgetary principles clash with regional or local interests. In pursuing the Blue Dog agenda, Ross may have a hard time reconciling the competing pressures bearing down on him.
An array of politically powerful interests in Arkansas oppose the House bill. Blue Cross Blue Shield, the dominant insurer with 75 percent of the state market, adamantly objects to a proposed government-run plan to compete with private insurers. The Arkansas State Chamber of Commerce, representing nearly 1,200 companies and groups that employ a quarter of the state’s workforce, strongly opposes this so-called public option and another feature requiring employers to provide coverage to workers or pay a penalty equal to 8 percent of their payrolls.
Ross generally agrees with their positions, but has to decide how far he can go in the pursuit of Blue Dog principles without alienating Democratic leaders and many low- and moderate-income constituents who likely would benefit from access to subsidized health insurance and an expansion of Medicaid, the state-federal program for the poor.
Ross “better than anyone knows the makeup of his district” and its health care needs, said Rich Huddleston, executive director of Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, a nonpartisan social welfare advocacy group. “We believe he supports the overall concern of health care reformIt’s just our hope that whatever he tries to push around cost containment doesn’t get in the way of promoting good health care for kids and their families.”

The Nevada County hospital was closed in 1995. (Ann Carrns/KHN)
Ross’ 4th congressional district covers the southern half of the state outside of Little Rock, with a third of it rural and the remainder dotted by towns including Hot Springs, Magnolia, Pine Bluff, Texarkana and Hope, the birthplace of former President Bill Clinton and the nearest town to Prescott with a hospital. Ross’ 660,000 constituents have a median income of $29,675. Republican John McCain swept the district in 2008 with 58 percent of the vote.
Prescott, where Ross and his family live, calls itself “The City of Progress.” Its railroad museum, housed in a restored 1912 train depot, is a point of pride. Pink and white crape myrtles enhance the look of the train tracks. Outside of town, horses graze in pastures abutting fields dotted with bulging bales of rolled hay.
It’s a classic rural scene, but the government seat of Nevada County is barely hanging on. Vacant storefronts dot the streetscape. Last year, Potlach Corp., a forest products business, closed its mill, eliminating about 180 jobs.
The economy is taking a toll on health care on Prescott. Two in 10 residents have no health care insurance, and those who do have coverage have seen their premiums skyrocket by 80 percent since 2000, according to data compiled by Ross’ office.
Raising Deductibles
Locally owned J.D. and Billy Hines Trucking Inc. has had to raise the deductible on its family policy to $2,000 to keep premiums, now $336 a month for employees, from rising faster. At her restaurant, Barham sometimes hears patrons talking about how they’re going to afford prescriptions. “They’ll say, ‘I’m going to get half my medication,” she said.
Barham frets about the well-being of her own uninsured employees, and has on occasion paid for them to see a doctor. But she has her own problems to worry about: poorly functioning heart valves that may eventually need surgery. Her hope is to remain healthy until she qualifies for Medicare, the federal program for the elderly and disabled, in three years.
The Prescott area’s has health problems that go beyond access to insurance. Its hospital, which was the only one in Nevada County, closed in 1995, with local doctors saying low federal reimbursement rates were partly to blame. Doctors themselves are in short supply: only three practice in Prescott, and two are nearing retirement age.
These issues worry Ross, 47, a five-term House member who is a former pharmacy owner and the grandson of a nurse. He said they’re not fully addressed in the House legislation, with its focus on providing insurance for millions of Americans. In response, the Blue Dogs have demanded “rural health equity” in the bill, including reimbursement rates for hospitals and doctors well above Medicare and Medicaid levels.
“You know, it’s easy to provide everybody a shiny new insurance card,” he said. “But what’s important here is they actually have access to a doctor once they get the insurance card.”
Across the state, over 500,000 people, including those with and without insurance, lack ready access to a health care or medical facility, according to the Community Health Centers of Arkansas, a primary care association representing 12 federally qualified health centers and providing services through 62 facilities to 129,000 patients.
“The issue for us in this area is that we’ve got to be sure health care is affordable and accessible and it’s not just about coverage,” said Sip B. Mouden, chief executive officer of the health centers. “We do need health care coverage, but we also need the availability and accessiblility of providers in the local area.”
Consider the situation of Dr. Charles Vermont, a quintessential rural doctor. He typically sees 40 patients a day in his office, and visits others聽in the hospital in Hope and in local nursing homes.
Cell Phones and Poems
He is free with his cell phone number, and often fields calls from patients at home during the evening and on weekends. His offices are equipped to take X-rays and do blood tests and other lab work, and to stabilize emergency cases. In addition to notices about co-pays, the wall of his waiting room features a poem by a patient, an ode to Vermont’s compassion.
Now 63, he’s suffering from sciatica, but can’t plan retirement in part because he worries about who will take care of his patients. If the lack of movie theaters and sophisticated restaurants doesn’t scare young doctors away, the often overwhelming stress of being on one’s own and caring for an aging, poor population usually does. “Prescott is not a lifestyle destination,” he said drily. “How do you recruit and retain new physicians?”
Vermont would like health care legislation to include more equitable reimbursements for rural and primary care physicians in particular; greater regulation of insurance companies, and more financial incentives for deployment of physician assistants to help rural doctors. Insuring more people also would help: Many of his patients lack coverage, one reason his office is owed more than $100,000.
At the Arkansas Hospital Association, president and CEO Phil Matthews is seeking adjustments to Medicare and Medicaid payment rates, which he says have been so low they have contributed to the closings of 20 hospitals since 1985. Randy Zook, president of the Chamber of Commerce, is wary of piling on more costs to businesses. “And we’re real suspicious,” he said, “that a government-run plan is a Trojan horse that would lead to a single-payer, government run insurance program.”
So far, Ross and the Blue Dogs aren’t saying precisely what it would take to win their support, and they have planned to submit amendments.
“We are very committed to health care reform and making health insurance affordable and accessible,” Ross said. “But we just think the Democratic leadership has gone about this the wrong way.”
This <a target="_blank" href="/news/ross/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">麻豆女优 Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150" style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">
<img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=20531&ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0" style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>Second of an occasional series on health information technology.
Fayetteville, Ark. 聳 Dr. Marek Durakiewicz initially welcomed the opportunity to send prescriptions to drugstores electronically, using free computer equipment provided by a state pilot program.
Part One: Doctors Say Electronic Data-Sharing Is Saving Lives, Money
The chief of staff at Hickman Community Hospital in Centerville, Tenn., Durakiewicz recognized the potential benefits of “e-prescribing.” Special software allows doctors to see instantly if the drug they are ordering is covered by a patient’s health insurance plan; if there’s a less expensive, generic alternative, or if the patient is already taking medication that may interact dangerously with the new one. For patients, there’s no piece of paper to misplace.
Advocates say e-prescribing is a key advance toward health care’s digital future because of its potential to reduce medical errors, cut drug costs and save doctors and patients time and money. E-prescribing is growing 聳 the number of doctors doing it is now more than 120,000, 20 percent of all office-based prescribers,聽according to an industry source. But kinks need to be worked out to spur more rapid acceptance.
Doctors and patients in a number of states have complaints, including Durakiewicz. Malfunctioning hardware and cumbersome security features — such as software that logged him out automatically every 30 minutes — left him frustrated. Patient prescription histories provided by the system weren’t as current as he had expected. In addition, federal restrictions prevented him from e-prescribing certain pain medications.
Now, a year later, he doesn’t use the pilot system at all. Instead, he types prescriptions into another computer and prints them out. “It’s faster,” said Durakiewicz, one of 50 doctors participating in the pilot offered by the state’s Medicaid program and the technology company Shared Health.
Emily Bagley, product development consultant with Shared Health, says electronic prescription histories should be immediately available; paper prescriptions take longer to retrieve. Log-offs, she says, result from federal regulations requiring e-prescribing software to log out doctors at regular intervals to prevent unauthorized use of systems.
There are other obstacles to e-prescribing, which helps explain why currently only about 10 percent of eligible prescriptions nationally are sent electronically. (Prescriptions for controlled substances, such as certain pain medications, aren’t eligible.) E-prescribing requires special computer equipment, which can be costly, and seamless coordination of an immense amount of data from doctors, health plans and pharmacies.
But federal money for health technology in the stimulus package and other incentives are expected to drive greater adoption of e-prescribing in coming years. Another key step occurred in 2008, when two prescription processing networks combined to form Surescripts. The e-prescribing company maintains the largest secure network through which doctors send prescriptions to patients’ pharmacies.
For the system to work, the doctor’s office must have e-prescribing software and an Internet connection; the patient’s health plan must participate, so the doctor can electronically check the patient’s drug benefit, and the patient’s pharmacy must be connected to Surescripts.
Currently, about three-quarters of U.S. retail pharmacies participate in Surescripts and support the network by paying transaction fees. Doctors generally don’t pay to send prescriptions, but they bear the costs of maintaining their computer system with periodic upgrades.
Rick Ratliff, president of the Virginia division of Surescripts, says the network, which processes 15 million prescriptions a month, is extremely reliable. However, with more than 130 different software programs certified to link with the network and many medical practices relatively new to e-prescribing, it’s inevitable that there will be problems, whether with the technology itself or with the people learning to use it, according to the company.
To encourage greater participation, Medicare, the federal health plan for the elderly, in January began giving e-prescribing doctors a bonus of 2 percent of their overall Medicare reimbursement. That incentive may be helping: Surescripts reports in the first three months of 2009 a 49 percent increase in e-prescriptions compared to the last quarter of 2008.
Tennessee — where only 3 percent of prescriptions are sent electronically 聳 is giving grants to more than 1,800 rural doctors to help them buy or upgrade electronic prescribing and medical records systems. The state also is offering training sessions.
Other states are encouraging doctors, too, hoping to contain prescribing costs and improve care. Arkansas is one of seven states that fully link their Medicaid programs for the poor to Surescripts. After the state began heavily promoting e-prescribing in December, the number of doctors using it shot up from 225 to 665 in March.
Pilot programs in states such as Mississippi and Florida have reduced Medicaid costs, mainly by elimination of duplicate prescriptions and increased use of generic drugs.
When it works as intended, doctors and patients are enthusiastic. “I love it,” said Amber Blackwell, a working mother whose Clarksville, Tenn., pediatrician prescribes electronically. “I have an 18-month-old, so I don’t have to carry anything else to keep track of. And when I get to the pharmacy it’s ready.”
Challenges persist, especially at small practices that lack in-house technical support. Cumberland Family Care, a three-office doctor group in Sparta, Tenn., obtained a state grant for e-prescribing software. But the system hasn’t always worked well. “We send about 150 to 200 electronic prescriptions a day,” said Mischelle Ferrell, the practice manager. The failure rate is now about 20 percent.
When that happens, patients arriving at their drugstores may find no record of their prescriptions. “There’s a mother with a kid with a fever at the pharmacy who drove 15 miles and waited in line, and they have no record of the prescription,” Ferrell said. “You’ve got one mad mother on your hands.”
“There will be problems,” conceded Melissa Hargiss, director of Tennessee’s Office of E-Health Initiatives. “But I would say to doctors that this is the best time for providers to start using it, while there’s grant money available to offset the costs.”
麻豆女优 Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at 麻豆女优鈥攁n independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .This <a target="_blank" href="/health-industry/eprescribe/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">麻豆女优 Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150" style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">
<img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=22027&ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0" style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>“I can’t tell you the stress of living on the edge, just wondering, ‘Am I going to get sick?'” she said in an interview at the Broadway Railroad Café, where fried catfish with hush puppies is a popular feature. “I feel embarrassed, almost, when I go to the doctors and tell them I don’t have insurance.”
Many people in and around this economically depressed town can’t afford insurance, even as the battered economy has made it harder for employers to provide coverage for workers. They’re looking to Washington for help, and Ross, a conservative Democrat with a strong voice in the debate over health care legislation, says he’s on their side.
Yet Ross stands ready to try to block passage of a House bill that, its supporters say, would provide exactly what Arkansas needs: guaranteed insurance and a wider choice of coverage at competitive prices.
Ross’ position reflects the conundrum confronting many lawmakers, including many he helps lead as head of the fiscally conservative Blue Dog Coalition’s health task force. Even if large numbers of constituents might benefit, many of the Blue Dogs generally oppose the $1 trillion bill because they say it’s too costly and doesn’t solve other health care problems in the their mostly rural districts.
“What we’re talking about is containing the cost, slowing the rate of growth of health care down where it can grow at the rate of inflation,” Ross said in an interview, “because if we don’t, it’s going to bankrupt this country.”
Unless changes are made, Ross and six other Blue Dog members of the Energy and Commerce Committee say they’ll vote against the bill this week, bucking party leaders eager for House passage by the end of July. In the hard bargaining taking place, the Blue Dogs are demanding guarantees that the legislation won’t add to the federal budget deficit and would protect small businesses in their districts from employer mandates that would drive up their operating costs.
Yet at the same time, the Blue Dogs also are seeking changes in the way rural hospitals and doctors are reimbursed for their services, which could substantially drive up Medicare and Medicaid expenditures.
Competing Pressures
As is often the case in congressional negotiations of this sort, overarching budgetary principles clash with regional or local interests. In pursuing the Blue Dog agenda, Ross may have a hard time reconciling the competing pressures bearing down on him.
An array of politically powerful interests in Arkansas oppose the House bill. Blue Cross Blue Shield, the dominant insurer with 75 percent of the state market, adamantly objects to a proposed government-run plan to compete with private insurers. The Arkansas State Chamber of Commerce, representing nearly 1,200 companies and groups that employ a quarter of the state’s workforce, strongly opposes this so-called public option and another feature requiring employers to provide coverage to workers or pay a penalty equal to 8 percent of their payrolls.
Ross generally agrees with their positions, but has to decide how far he can go in the pursuit of Blue Dog principles without alienating Democratic leaders and many low- and moderate-income constituents who likely would benefit from access to subsidized health insurance and an expansion of Medicaid, the state-federal program for the poor.
Ross “better than anyone knows the makeup of his district” and its health care needs, said Rich Huddleston, executive director of Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, a nonpartisan social welfare advocacy group. “We believe he supports the overall concern of health care reformIt’s just our hope that whatever he tries to push around cost containment doesn’t get in the way of promoting good health care for kids and their families.”

The Nevada County hospital was closed in 1995. (Ann Carrns/KHN)
Ross’ 4th congressional district covers the southern half of the state outside of Little Rock, with a third of it rural and the remainder dotted by towns including Hot Springs, Magnolia, Pine Bluff, Texarkana and Hope, the birthplace of former President Bill Clinton and the nearest town to Prescott with a hospital. Ross’ 660,000 constituents have a median income of $29,675. Republican John McCain swept the district in 2008 with 58 percent of the vote.
Prescott, where Ross and his family live, calls itself “The City of Progress.” Its railroad museum, housed in a restored 1912 train depot, is a point of pride. Pink and white crape myrtles enhance the look of the train tracks. Outside of town, horses graze in pastures abutting fields dotted with bulging bales of rolled hay.
It’s a classic rural scene, but the government seat of Nevada County is barely hanging on. Vacant storefronts dot the streetscape. Last year, Potlach Corp., a forest products business, closed its mill, eliminating about 180 jobs.
The economy is taking a toll on health care on Prescott. Two in 10 residents have no health care insurance, and those who do have coverage have seen their premiums skyrocket by 80 percent since 2000, according to data compiled by Ross’ office.
Raising Deductibles
Locally owned J.D. and Billy Hines Trucking Inc. has had to raise the deductible on its family policy to $2,000 to keep premiums, now $336 a month for employees, from rising faster. At her restaurant, Barham sometimes hears patrons talking about how they’re going to afford prescriptions. “They’ll say, ‘I’m going to get half my medication,” she said.
Barham frets about the well-being of her own uninsured employees, and has on occasion paid for them to see a doctor. But she has her own problems to worry about: poorly functioning heart valves that may eventually need surgery. Her hope is to remain healthy until she qualifies for Medicare, the federal program for the elderly and disabled, in three years.
The Prescott area’s has health problems that go beyond access to insurance. Its hospital, which was the only one in Nevada County, closed in 1995, with local doctors saying low federal reimbursement rates were partly to blame. Doctors themselves are in short supply: only three practice in Prescott, and two are nearing retirement age.
These issues worry Ross, 47, a five-term House member who is a former pharmacy owner and the grandson of a nurse. He said they’re not fully addressed in the House legislation, with its focus on providing insurance for millions of Americans. In response, the Blue Dogs have demanded “rural health equity” in the bill, including reimbursement rates for hospitals and doctors well above Medicare and Medicaid levels.
“You know, it’s easy to provide everybody a shiny new insurance card,” he said. “But what’s important here is they actually have access to a doctor once they get the insurance card.”
Across the state, over 500,000 people, including those with and without insurance, lack ready access to a health care or medical facility, according to the Community Health Centers of Arkansas, a primary care association representing 12 federally qualified health centers and providing services through 62 facilities to 129,000 patients.
“The issue for us in this area is that we’ve got to be sure health care is affordable and accessible and it’s not just about coverage,” said Sip B. Mouden, chief executive officer of the health centers. “We do need health care coverage, but we also need the availability and accessiblility of providers in the local area.”
Consider the situation of Dr. Charles Vermont, a quintessential rural doctor. He typically sees 40 patients a day in his office, and visits others聽in the hospital in Hope and in local nursing homes.
Cell Phones and Poems
He is free with his cell phone number, and often fields calls from patients at home during the evening and on weekends. His offices are equipped to take X-rays and do blood tests and other lab work, and to stabilize emergency cases. In addition to notices about co-pays, the wall of his waiting room features a poem by a patient, an ode to Vermont’s compassion.
Now 63, he’s suffering from sciatica, but can’t plan retirement in part because he worries about who will take care of his patients. If the lack of movie theaters and sophisticated restaurants doesn’t scare young doctors away, the often overwhelming stress of being on one’s own and caring for an aging, poor population usually does. “Prescott is not a lifestyle destination,” he said drily. “How do you recruit and retain new physicians?”
Vermont would like health care legislation to include more equitable reimbursements for rural and primary care physicians in particular; greater regulation of insurance companies, and more financial incentives for deployment of physician assistants to help rural doctors. Insuring more people also would help: Many of his patients lack coverage, one reason his office is owed more than $100,000.
At the Arkansas Hospital Association, president and CEO Phil Matthews is seeking adjustments to Medicare and Medicaid payment rates, which he says have been so low they have contributed to the closings of 20 hospitals since 1985. Randy Zook, president of the Chamber of Commerce, is wary of piling on more costs to businesses. “And we’re real suspicious,” he said, “that a government-run plan is a Trojan horse that would lead to a single-payer, government run insurance program.”
So far, Ross and the Blue Dogs aren’t saying precisely what it would take to win their support, and they have planned to submit amendments.
“We are very committed to health care reform and making health insurance affordable and accessible,” Ross said. “But we just think the Democratic leadership has gone about this the wrong way.”
This <a target="_blank" href="/news/ross/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">麻豆女优 Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150" style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">
<img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=20531&ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0" style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>Second of an occasional series on health information technology.
Fayetteville, Ark. 聳 Dr. Marek Durakiewicz initially welcomed the opportunity to send prescriptions to drugstores electronically, using free computer equipment provided by a state pilot program.
Part One: Doctors Say Electronic Data-Sharing Is Saving Lives, Money
The chief of staff at Hickman Community Hospital in Centerville, Tenn., Durakiewicz recognized the potential benefits of “e-prescribing.” Special software allows doctors to see instantly if the drug they are ordering is covered by a patient’s health insurance plan; if there’s a less expensive, generic alternative, or if the patient is already taking medication that may interact dangerously with the new one. For patients, there’s no piece of paper to misplace.
Advocates say e-prescribing is a key advance toward health care’s digital future because of its potential to reduce medical errors, cut drug costs and save doctors and patients time and money. E-prescribing is growing 聳 the number of doctors doing it is now more than 120,000, 20 percent of all office-based prescribers,聽according to an industry source. But kinks need to be worked out to spur more rapid acceptance.
Doctors and patients in a number of states have complaints, including Durakiewicz. Malfunctioning hardware and cumbersome security features — such as software that logged him out automatically every 30 minutes — left him frustrated. Patient prescription histories provided by the system weren’t as current as he had expected. In addition, federal restrictions prevented him from e-prescribing certain pain medications.
Now, a year later, he doesn’t use the pilot system at all. Instead, he types prescriptions into another computer and prints them out. “It’s faster,” said Durakiewicz, one of 50 doctors participating in the pilot offered by the state’s Medicaid program and the technology company Shared Health.
Emily Bagley, product development consultant with Shared Health, says electronic prescription histories should be immediately available; paper prescriptions take longer to retrieve. Log-offs, she says, result from federal regulations requiring e-prescribing software to log out doctors at regular intervals to prevent unauthorized use of systems.
There are other obstacles to e-prescribing, which helps explain why currently only about 10 percent of eligible prescriptions nationally are sent electronically. (Prescriptions for controlled substances, such as certain pain medications, aren’t eligible.) E-prescribing requires special computer equipment, which can be costly, and seamless coordination of an immense amount of data from doctors, health plans and pharmacies.
But federal money for health technology in the stimulus package and other incentives are expected to drive greater adoption of e-prescribing in coming years. Another key step occurred in 2008, when two prescription processing networks combined to form Surescripts. The e-prescribing company maintains the largest secure network through which doctors send prescriptions to patients’ pharmacies.
For the system to work, the doctor’s office must have e-prescribing software and an Internet connection; the patient’s health plan must participate, so the doctor can electronically check the patient’s drug benefit, and the patient’s pharmacy must be connected to Surescripts.
Currently, about three-quarters of U.S. retail pharmacies participate in Surescripts and support the network by paying transaction fees. Doctors generally don’t pay to send prescriptions, but they bear the costs of maintaining their computer system with periodic upgrades.
Rick Ratliff, president of the Virginia division of Surescripts, says the network, which processes 15 million prescriptions a month, is extremely reliable. However, with more than 130 different software programs certified to link with the network and many medical practices relatively new to e-prescribing, it’s inevitable that there will be problems, whether with the technology itself or with the people learning to use it, according to the company.
To encourage greater participation, Medicare, the federal health plan for the elderly, in January began giving e-prescribing doctors a bonus of 2 percent of their overall Medicare reimbursement. That incentive may be helping: Surescripts reports in the first three months of 2009 a 49 percent increase in e-prescriptions compared to the last quarter of 2008.
Tennessee — where only 3 percent of prescriptions are sent electronically 聳 is giving grants to more than 1,800 rural doctors to help them buy or upgrade electronic prescribing and medical records systems. The state also is offering training sessions.
Other states are encouraging doctors, too, hoping to contain prescribing costs and improve care. Arkansas is one of seven states that fully link their Medicaid programs for the poor to Surescripts. After the state began heavily promoting e-prescribing in December, the number of doctors using it shot up from 225 to 665 in March.
Pilot programs in states such as Mississippi and Florida have reduced Medicaid costs, mainly by elimination of duplicate prescriptions and increased use of generic drugs.
When it works as intended, doctors and patients are enthusiastic. “I love it,” said Amber Blackwell, a working mother whose Clarksville, Tenn., pediatrician prescribes electronically. “I have an 18-month-old, so I don’t have to carry anything else to keep track of. And when I get to the pharmacy it’s ready.”
Challenges persist, especially at small practices that lack in-house technical support. Cumberland Family Care, a three-office doctor group in Sparta, Tenn., obtained a state grant for e-prescribing software. But the system hasn’t always worked well. “We send about 150 to 200 electronic prescriptions a day,” said Mischelle Ferrell, the practice manager. The failure rate is now about 20 percent.
When that happens, patients arriving at their drugstores may find no record of their prescriptions. “There’s a mother with a kid with a fever at the pharmacy who drove 15 miles and waited in line, and they have no record of the prescription,” Ferrell said. “You’ve got one mad mother on your hands.”
“There will be problems,” conceded Melissa Hargiss, director of Tennessee’s Office of E-Health Initiatives. “But I would say to doctors that this is the best time for providers to start using it, while there’s grant money available to offset the costs.”
麻豆女优 Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at 麻豆女优鈥攁n independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .This <a target="_blank" href="/health-industry/eprescribe/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="">麻豆女优 Health News</a> and is republished here under a <a target="_blank" href=" Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src="/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2023/04/kffhealthnews-icon.png?w=150" style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">
<img id="republication-tracker-tool-source" src="/?republication-pixel=true&post=22027&ga4=G-J74WWTKFM0" style="width:1px;height:1px;">]]>