Viewpoints: President’s Budget Is A Catastrophe In Making For Millions; Doctors Would Turn Away From ‘Medicare For All’
Opinion writers weigh in on these health care topics and others.
In accordance with the old adage that budgets are political documents, President Trump鈥檚 budgets are windows into his political id. Trump鈥檚 proposed $4.8-trillion budget for the 2021 fiscal year makes his intentions crystal clear: He means to shred the federal safety net for the poor and the sick. The budget proposal released Monday calls for drastic cuts in Social Security and Medicaid benefits, as well as in a program protecting defrauded student loan borrowers. (Michael Hiltzik, 2/10)
For once, President Trump spoke the truth.鈥淲e鈥檙e doing a lot of things that are good, including waste and fraud,鈥 he said Monday, as his administration released its proposed budget. 鈥淭remendous waste and tremendous fraud.鈥 No question about it! Trump鈥檚 budget is a tremendous fraud 鈥 and it lays tremendous waste to his promises. (Dana Millbank, 2/10)
Professional groups representing doctors are buying into Democratic plans to remake health care鈥攁nd thereby acting against the interests of their members. The American College of Physicians, the second-largest organization of U.S. doctors, recently came out in support of either a public option or single payer. At the American Medical Association鈥檚 annual meeting last year, some 47% of delegates voted to reverse the organization鈥檚 opposition to single payer. A new organization styling itself Physicians for a National Health Program has attracted some 20,000 members. (Sally C. Pipes, 2/10)
In the 鈥90s, chronic pain was rampant in America. Opioids, which had previously been taboo, were suddenly being prescribed by doctors. A supposedly safer opioid had been developed which, as a physician wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine, was 鈥渘ot a hypnotic鈥 and carried no 鈥渄anger of acquiring the habit.鈥漈his movement created a monster, addicting millions of Americans to opioids. Global overproduction fueled even more demand and, as authorities clamped down, many of those addicted to these medicines turned to more potent ones, making an overdose only a minor miscalculation away. I鈥檓 referring, of course, to the eighteen nineties, which eerily echo how the modern opioid epidemic emerged a century later. (Haider J. Warraich, 2/11)
Lawmakers in more than half a dozen states are considering ways to block medical treatment for transgender teenagers. They cast their efforts as a crusade against forced sterilization, 鈥渕utilation鈥 and child abuse. Yet the greatest harm to these adolescents may come from the rules purported to protect them. South Dakota鈥檚 Republican-supermajority House of Representatives recently passed a bill that would ban medical professionals from providing hormones or gender confirmation surgery to children younger than 16, with a penalty of one year鈥檚 jail time and a fine as high as $2,000. Legislators in Florida, South Carolina, Colorado, Missouri, Oklahoma and Kentucky have filed similar proposals. Missouri鈥檚 bill would report consenting parents to child welfare officials. (2/10)
A new rule proposed by the Department of Health and Human Services in mid-January, 鈥淓nsuring Equal Treatment of Faith-Based Organizations,鈥 is intended to provide clarity about the rights and obligations of faith-based organizations and also eliminate certain requirements previously imposed on those organizations. The rule, according to HHS, ensures that faith-based organizations have the rights and freedoms to which they are entitled under both the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. ...As a bioethicist and a rabbi, I believe that Jewish medical ethics can provide a means to think about securing both religious freedom and the rights of nonreligious Americans. (Ira Bedzow, 2/11)
Mental health parity 鈥 treating mental and physical illnesses with equal seriousness, concern, and coverage 鈥 has been the law of the land for decades. But changing laws is easy; changing actual clinical practice and the health care system that supports it is far more difficult. This week the Massachusetts Senate is scheduled to vote on a package of legislation aimed at bringing actual practice into the 21st century. The Mental Health ABC Act: Addressing Barriers to Care seeks both to 鈥渆rase the stigma of mental illness鈥 and 鈥渂uild an affordable integrated system,鈥 Senate President Karen Spilka said in introducing the legislation last Thursday. (2/11)
Kentucky is among the 11 states where both the number and rate of uninsured young children has increased significantly in that two-year period. Uninsured children under age six in our state increased by a devastating 50.7%, which translates to 12,973 of our youngest children without access to care. The implications are profound for these children and their families. Without access to health coverage, kids could miss the routine and necessary care that will help them thrive. (Beauregard, 2/10)
The solution is to clear the way for advanced practice registered nurses (nurse practitioners, nurse midwives, nurse anesthetists, clinical nurse specialists) to do what they are educated and trained to do: serve communities and patients independently. This legislative session, the Tennessee Nurses Association will be introducing state legislation to update the Nurse Practice Act and do just that. The fact is nurse practitioners are already trained and qualified to perform many primary care tasks. The problem is, however, Tennessee state laws do not permit them to do so 鈥 except with physician oversight. (Tina Gerardi, 2/10)