麻豆女优

U.S. manufacturers of medical devices started 2016 with a windfall 鈥� a two-year suspension of a on their revenue.

Medical devices include used in medical care, such as tongue depressors, endoscopes and MRI scanners, for example. Manufacturers said the tax on devices hurt their business. The Congressional Research Service聽 companies paid out $2.4 billion in 2014.

鈥淲hen this tax went into place, it forced us to make cuts and sustain those cuts,鈥� said聽, chief financial officer of Minnesota-based . His firm takes in more than $1 billion a year for its specialty medical products.

Smiths Medical had paid $10 million a year in medical device taxes, Montague said, 鈥渁nd so now we鈥檙e getting that funding back.鈥� He insisted the money will go into building the business.

鈥淲e鈥檙e making significant investment in our product portfolio 鈥� in improving our product portfolio,鈥� Montague said. 鈥淎nd what this enables us to do is accelerate some of that investment.鈥�

The medical technology industry has branded the device tax a , though that claim . Montague said Smiths Medical will now be adding new jobs, but he doesn鈥檛 know how many.

Minnesota is home to a concentration of device makers, and , R-Minn., is a leading opponent of the tax. He said suspending it for two years could provide a major boost to Minnesota鈥檚 economy.

鈥淭here are estimates that because of Minnesota鈥檚 high concentration in this sector 鈥� essentially the largest in the world in a concentrated environment 鈥� that Minnesota would be paying 25 percent of the tax,鈥� Paulsen said. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 a big deal to our economy.鈥�

Bob Paulson is CEO of , a small firm in Minnesota that makes devices involved in the treatment of urological conditions. His company had only been paying the device tax since November, he said, when NxThera started selling products in the United States. The tax made it harder to find financing, he said, because investors balked at putting their money into an industry that鈥檚 been singled out to pay a tax. Thanks to the tax hiatus, he said, he now plans to enlarge his staff of 43 researchers and sales people.

鈥淚t absolutely means additional money that we can invest in both of those areas,鈥� he said.

Still, some industry analysts questioned whether suspending the tax will significantly boost the number of jobs created.

The Congressional Research Service concluded the tax was having 聽on employment, changing payrolls by no more than two-tenths of 1 percent. Still, the same report called the tax difficult to justify and noted that such excise taxes are typically put in place to discourage a particular behavior, such as smoking.

, a senior analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence, said the suspension won鈥檛 really change what big companies are doing, but will help their bottom lines. Big, publicly traded firms also might return the money to shareholders by buying up their own shares, he said.

鈥淪maller companies felt a bigger tax bite than the giants, so they are more likely to put the tax savings back into the business,鈥� McGorman said.

Industry analyst , of Piper Jaffray, said device makers would be smart to reinvest the windfall.

鈥淧olitically, they better spend this money on R-and-D,鈥� West said, 鈥渙r the government can look at this and say, you know, 鈥楲ook, if you just pass this on to the shareholders, we鈥檙e going to reimpose the tax.鈥� 鈥�

But Rep. Paulsen said he doubts the tax will return. He鈥檚 optimistic the two-year tax suspension will become a permanent repeal.

This story is part of a reporting partnership with , 补苍诲听.