Dolores County Sheriff Don Wilson never expected to use Colorado鈥檚 red flag law when it was passed in 2019. He thought the law made it too easy to take a person's guns away.
The statute allows law enforcement officers or private citizens to petition a county court to confiscate firearms temporarily from people who pose an imminent threat to themselves or others.
鈥淎ll it is is one person鈥檚 word against another,鈥 said Wilson, whose sparsely populated territory is in southwestern Colorado near the Utah border.
Then, in August 2020, a Dove Creek man threatening to kill his neighbors and himself pointed a semi-automatic rifle at a deputy. Wilson petitioned for and was granted an extreme risk protection order to remove the man鈥檚 weapons, though the sheriff said his mistrust of the red flag law has not changed.
鈥淚f a gentleman pulls a rifle on my deputy and then comes and threatens to shoot up my courthouse and kill me, kill the judges, and kill the district attorney,鈥 Wilson said, 鈥淚鈥檝e got a problem with that person having a gun.鈥
The Uvalde, Texas, school shooting prompted a bipartisan in Congress that could provide funding to encourage more states to pass red flag laws. But in response to conservative objections, included funding for crisis intervention to states whether or not they establish red flag laws.
Similar opposition was seen in Colorado, where Dolores County and at least 36 other counties declared themselves 鈥淪econd Amendment sanctuaries鈥 after the red flag law was introduced.
But 2陆 years later, those declarations appear to have had little effect on whether protection orders based on the law are filed or enforced. Petitions for protection orders have been filed in 20 of the 37 sanctuary counties, often by the very sheriffs who had previously denounced the law, according to a KHN analysis of the petitions obtained through county-by-county public records requests.
鈥淭hese are sheriffs and law enforcement who were originally saying, 鈥榃e want nothing to do with this law,鈥欌 said , state affairs adviser for the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions. 鈥淏ut in practice, they are using it, and this is not something that鈥檚 unique to Colorado. Law enforcement ended up realizing, 鈥楬ey, this is the best tool we have to protect ourselves.鈥欌
Nineteen states and Washington, D.C., have implemented some form of red flag law while, according to the website SanctuaryCounties.com, more than 62% of U.S. counties are now covered by either state or county Second Amendment sanctuary resolutions.
Research shows red flag laws save lives. Duke University that for every 10 gun removals, one death is prevented. from the University of Indianapolis found similar reductions in suicide rates after red flag laws were passed in Connecticut and Indiana.
Another analysis, by researchers with the Injury & Violence Prevention Center at the Colorado School of Public Health, found that in the first year of the Colorado red flag law, 85% of protection orders granted by judges had been filed by law enforcement.
鈥淎 lot of that is because the law enforcement petitions may have been more complete,鈥 said Dr. , an epidemiologist and deputy director of the center. 鈥淭hey had the information that judges needed to move forward with it.鈥
Studies in , , and also found the majority of petitions are filed by law enforcement. Although California鈥檚 red flag law has been in effect for more than five years, two-thirds of the Californians had never heard of it.
Betz and her team found the same hurdle in Colorado. 鈥淚 hope there will be some improvement in awareness and education, both for the public and also for law enforcement,鈥 she said, 鈥渕aking it easier for people to understand how they work and when you might want to get one and how you would do that.鈥
In Colorado counties where sheriffs have declined to use the red flag law, protection orders have been filed by other law enforcement agencies. Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams has been one of the more vocal critics of the law and made saying he鈥檇 rather go to jail than enforce it. Nonetheless, 12 petitions were filed in Weld County, including two by municipal police departments.
鈥淢y stance is still the same,鈥 Reams said. 鈥淯nder no circumstances am I going to take someone鈥檚 guns in violation of their constitutional rights.鈥
Reams describes the law as 鈥渟hallow鈥 and doing nothing to address the mental issues that might contribute to violence. 鈥淥ur goal is to address the person and try to figure out how to get the person the help they need,鈥 he said.
The process for citizens to file extreme risk protection order petitions can be challenging. Many of those reviewed by KHN showed filers didn鈥檛 understand the red flag law, including one petition that was filed in the wrong county.
Other petitions filed by citizens were clearly outside the intent of the law.
Prisoners in county jails filed petitions against their sheriff jailers, including one who accused the sheriff of slavery. A Larimer County woman she had a child in common with a police officer in a bid to have his guns taken away.
But judges rejected all those petitions, bolstering supporters鈥 argument that protections against misuse are built into the law.
鈥淲e documented the rare few cases of people misusing the law, but those petitions were not allowed,鈥 said Betz, the Colorado epidemiologist. 鈥淭hat shows that the system worked.鈥
During the debate over the Colorado bill, opponents argued that the law would allow vindictive people to take guns away from others for no good reason.
鈥淲e鈥檙e just really not seeing that,鈥 said Boulder County Sheriff Joe Pelle. 鈥淲hat we are seeing is that law enforcement has a tool to use in cases where someone is truly a risk to themselves or others and shouldn鈥檛 have a firearm.鈥
Even before the Colorado law was passed in 2019, Alamosa County鈥檚 Board of County Commissioners reinforcing the county鈥檚 commitment to the right to bear arms. Afterward, Sheriff Robert Jackson issued a statement in support of the resolution, saying the red flag bill lacked due process, didn鈥檛 address mental health concerns, and would put his deputies at increased risk.
Since then, Alamosa County judges have granted two petitions under the law, one from the county sheriff鈥檚 office and one from the Alamosa Police Department.
Jackson said his concern was over the ability of private citizens to file for protection orders. Law enforcement, he said, files only after looking into the facts.
鈥淛udges sometimes aren鈥檛 really good at investigating stuff,鈥 he said.
Douglas County Sheriff Tony Spurlock, one of the most outspoken proponents of the Colorado law, said his office filed four protective orders in the first year of the law.
鈥淢ost of the time when we have people who have extreme mental health crises, unfortunately, there鈥檚 an outcome of either suicide or homicide,鈥 he said. 鈥淭he four cases that we鈥檝e done, all four of those individuals are alive today and are productive members of our society and are working toward a healthier life.鈥
Spurlock said many sheriffs still refuse to make use of a law that鈥檚 saved lives. He said he has asked some of them pointed questions about what it means to be a Second Amendment sanctuary, such as whether armed robbers and rapists are entitled to guns.
鈥淭hen they get pissed at me,鈥 Spurlock said. 鈥淢y number of friends is dwindling.鈥
KHN reporter Jacob Owens contributed to this article.
麻豆女优 Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at 麻豆女优鈥攁n independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about .