Morning Briefing
Summaries of health policy coverage from major news organizations
On Anniversary Of Roe V. Wade, Biden Campaign Pushes For Abortion Rights
President Joe Biden will convene key members of his Cabinet on Monday to discuss abortion rights on the 51st anniversary of the Roe v. Wade ruling, according to a White House official. The president will 鈥渉ear directly from physicians on the frontlines of the fallout鈥 since the landmark decision was reversed and detail new actions his administration is taking to strengthen access to contraception and medication abortion, as well as ensuring patients can receive emergency medical care.聽The meeting will mark the fourth time his task force on reproductive health care access has come together since the fall of Roe roughly a year and a half ago.聽 (Alba, 1/22)
The Biden campaign will hit the airwaves in battleground states with its first abortion-focused ad of the year,聽featuring stark,聽emotional聽testimony聽from a woman personally affected by a state abortion ban who lays the blame directly on former President Donald Trump. It comes as the campaign is launching a full-court press this week to put abortion rights front and center in the 2024 race, including with events headlined by President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris. The push聽marks the campaign鈥檚 first organized effort to聽emphasize the issue, seeking to further galvanize voters聽around reproductive rights in the first presidential election聽after the Supreme Court ended the federal constitutional right to an abortion. (Saenz, 1/22)
鈥淭his is the biggest election in terms of abortion that I鈥檝e lived through and any of us have lived through to date,鈥 said Mary Ziegler, a professor of law at UC Davis and a leading abortion historian. One major change since the 1970s is that abortion is now a partisan issue. 鈥淭hat was not true in 1973. It was hard to be a single-issue voter,鈥 said Ms. Ziegler. 鈥淚n 1976, neither candidate had a very clear position on abortion.鈥 (Webster, 1/22)
Today marks 51 years since Roe v. Wade, now overturned, was decided. And the anniversary is one of many opportunities that Democrats are seizing to remind voters which party seeks to keep curtailing abortion access. 鈥淚t鈥檚 crystal clear to me that the GOP is fully committed to a nationwide abortion ban,鈥 Rep. Pat Ryan told Playbook. 鈥淭hey鈥檙e continuing to even more aggressively pursue that, literally choosing a speaker of the House that authored the bill for a nationwide abortion ban. And that would certainly affect New York.鈥 (Ngo, Reisman and Coltin, 1/22)
Roe v. Wade may be history but Monday's anniversary of the 1973 decision is providing a potent rallying point for both sides in the abortion wars. Amid a showdown over funding the government, House Republican leaders brought up a pair of symbolic bills they said would protect pregnant women's rights but that Democrats contend would further erode abortion access. (Knight, 1/19)
Also 鈥
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says an Oklahoma hospital did not violate federal law when doctors told a woman with a nonviable pregnancy to wait in the parking lot until her condition worsened enough to qualify for an abortion under the state鈥檚 strict ban. Jaci Statton, 26, was among several women last year who challenged abortion restrictions that went into effect in Republican-led states after the Supreme Court revoked the nationwide right to abortion in 2022. Rather than join a lawsuit, Statton filed a complaint with the Department of Health and Human Services under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA. (Kruesi, 1/19)
Less than two years ago, the Supreme Court eliminated the federal right to an abortion, a decision that the court鈥檚 conservative majority suggested would remove them from further litigation of abortion rights. 聽鈥漈he Court鈥檚 decision properly leaves the question of abortion for the people and their elected representatives in the democratic process,鈥 Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a concurring opinion. But this term, the court is now set to hear two cases that could further undercut access to the procedure. (Luthra, 1/19)