麻豆女优

Skip to main content

The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news.

Subscribe Follow Us
  • Trump 2.0

    Trump 2.0

    • Agency Watch
    • State Watch
    • Rural Health Payout
  • Public Health

    Public Health

    • Vaccines
    • CDC & Disease
    • Environmental Health
  • Audio Reports

    Audio Reports

    • What the Health?
    • Health Care Helpline
    • 麻豆女优 Health News Minute
    • An Arm and a Leg
    • Health Hub
    • HealthQ
    • Silence in Sikeston
    • Epidemic
    • See All Audio
  • Special Reports

    Special Reports

    • Bill Of The Month
    • The Body Shops
    • Broken Rehab
    • Deadly Denials
    • Priced Out
    • Dead Zone
    • Diagnosis: Debt
    • Overpayment Outrage
    • Opioid Settlement Tracking
    • See All Special Reports
  • More Topics

    More Topics

    • Elections
    • Health Care Costs
    • Insurance
    • Prescription Drugs
    • Health Industry
    • Immigration
    • Reproductive Health
    • Technology
    • Rural Health
    • Race and Health
    • Aging
    • Mental Health
    • Affordable Care Act
    • Medicare
    • Medicaid
    • Children’s Health

  • Medicaid Work Mandate
  • Suicide Prevention
  • Community Health Workers
  • Rural Health Payout
  • Opioid Crisis

TRENDING TOPICS:

  • Medicaid Work Mandate
  • Suicide Prevention
  • Community Health Workers
  • Rural Health Payout
  • Opioid Crisis

Morning Briefing

Summaries of health policy coverage from major news organizations

  • Email

Wednesday, Jan 11 2017

Full Issue

Perspectives On Repealing And Replacing; Timing Issues; And Detailing Some Obamacare Facts

Opinion writers around the country offer their thoughts on the ongoing debate about the GOP Congress' efforts to dismantle the 2010 health law and how -- because of the measure's sweeping nature -- their efforts are no easy task.

Every important legislative reform has Perils of Pauline moments, but the early Republican anxiety over ObamaCare repeal and replace is less than promising. Liberals want to label the effort a failure before the hard work even begins, and President-elect Trump and Congress need to swiftly unite around a better health-care alternative and a political strategy to pass it. (1/10)

On Tuesday, Donald J. Trump said he wanted Congress to repeal the Affordable Care Act right away and replace it with a new plan 鈥渧ery shortly thereafter.鈥 But before they abandon all the work that has gone into the health care law since 2010, President-elect Trump and Republicans in Congress owe Americans a detailed explanation of how they plan to replace it. They should not repeal the law until they have submitted their replacement proposal for analysis by nonpartisan authorities like the Congressional Budget Office and the Tax Policy Center to determine how it will affect health insurance coverage, state and federal finances and individual tax burdens. (Harold Pollack and Timothy S. Jost, 1/10)

President-elect Donald Trump and other Republican leaders may be determined to repeal the Affordable Care Act immediately, but a few more sensible members of the party are now trying to slow down this runaway train. They recognize the danger in destroying a program that directly benefits 22 million Americans 鈥 and indirectly millions more by controlling costs 鈥 without a plan to replace it. That perhaps obvious insight has yet to penetrate Mr. Trump鈥檚 reality distortion field. (1/11)

For six years, Republicans have voted more than 60 times to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. 鈥淩epeal and replace鈥 was a staple of Donald Trump鈥檚 stump speech. Give us control, Republicans promised, and what Mike Pence promises as the 鈥渇irst order of business鈥 will be repeal and replace. Only one problem: There is no plan. (Katrina vanden Heuvel, 1/10)

This morning, I speculated that Donald Trump might blow up the congressional GOP strategy of 鈥渞epeal and delay鈥 by insisting that Republicans stick to his insistence, made in a post-election interview, that repeal and replace be done 鈥渟imultaneously.鈥 Trump seemed reluctant to sign a repeal measure that leaves the Affordable Care Act鈥檚 replacement open to doubt 鈥 since, after all, he repeatedly promised to replace it with 鈥渟omething terrific,鈥 and suggested this would be easy to do. Well, now Trump has indeed weighed in again along those lines. (Greg Sargent, 1/10)

Last week President Barack Obama made a rare appearance on Capitol Hill for a closed-door meeting with Democrats. Don鈥檛 鈥渞escue鈥 Republicans when it comes to repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, he reportedly told them. 鈥淚f they want to break this, they own it,鈥 Sen. Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, said shortly after the meeting. He is exactly right. (1/10)

Republicans have expressed interest in repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act (ACA), restructuring Medicare to a premium support model, and reforming Medicaid through either block grants or per capita caps. Taking on all three programs is an extremely heavy lift 鈥 both politically and legislatively. If it is improbable to do all three, Republicans should openly acknowledge that they are taking Medicare restructuring off the table. ... Without Medicare as a rallying point, Democrats would be forced to defend the Affordable Care Act (ACA) which is relatively unpopular and in need of reconsideration. Refusing to engage might not be in their political interest. (Rodney Whitlock, 1/10)

After eight years Republicans are finally in a position to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Many caution that repeal without concomitant replacement will lead to chaos in the insurance markets with millions losing coverage. These fears are overstated. Yet replacement should accompany repeal for another reason -- to maximize the chance that a good replacement package can be enacted. (Joel Zinberg, 1/11)

Even if we live in a post-truth culture, which I doubt, we do not live in a fact-free zone. Underneath politicians鈥 unending efforts to frame issues and events to their advantage resides a world that is what it is, however they may choose to describe it. When rhetoric and facts diverge, the world has a nasty habit of reasserting itself. This real world helps explain the emerging Republican shift on ObamaCare. (William A. Galston, 1/10)

Republican plans to repeal the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) threaten the health care of 30 million Americans and would erode some rare progress made recently to reverse America鈥檚 growing economic inequality. By taxing rich households and big corporations to subsidize health care for working families, the ACA does what good public policy should: level the playing field to give everyone a shot, not just those at the top. Abolishing the ACA would only further tilt the field in favor of the wealthy and well-connected. (Frank Clemente and Ron Pollack, 1/11)

Republicans are gearing up to repeal Obamacare 鈥 what House Speaker Paul Ryan calls 鈥渢he first order of business鈥 for the new Congress and the Trump administration. House and Senate committees will be under intense deadline pressure to write legislation before the end of the month that would undercut major pillars of Obamacare as part of a budget bill. Yes, the GOP is in a hurry to rid the nation of Obamacare. But remember the second half of the Republican mantra 鈥 鈥渞eplace.鈥 Where is the detailed GOP plan to help millions of Americans who have coverage now under Obamacare? (1/11)

When it was merely an impotent gesture of rage and contempt sure to be blocked or vetoed, Republican members of the House voted some 60 times to repeal or seriously undermine the ACA. Their chance to do it for real is nigh, and Trump pressed Tuesday afternoon for a repeal vote "probably sometime next week." I suspect they'll chicken out. (Eric Zorn, 1/10)

Every day, it seems, the incoming Republican-led administration issues a new target in its planned repeal of the ACA (otherwise known as Obamacare), which provides health care to an estimated 20 million people.聽... [Daniel E. Dawes, an Atlanta-based health-care lawyer] is the executive director of health policy and external affairs at the Morehouse School of Medicine, and founder and chair of the National Working Group on Health Disparities and Health Reform. He literally wrote the book on Obamacare 鈥 and can鈥檛 understand why it鈥檚 under fire. Republicans have said 鈥 and have been saying for years 鈥 they will tear the health-care plan down to the studs and replace it with a plan of their own. But we haven鈥檛 seen a word of that plan, Dawes said. (Nicole Brodeur, 1/10)

For most of the last 15 years, my clinical practice as a聽physician has been exclusively with homeless men, women and children. The work is both energizing and distressing, heartwarming and heartbreaking. In 2013, Ohio expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, and the lives of my patients changed dramatically for the better. Suddenly poor and sick adults who previously had to choose between medicine and food, or health care and housing, had an opportunity to have both. (Nancy Elder, 1/10)

The market impact is clear. When healthier people don't buy insurance, premiums stay high because the pool of people who do buy insurance is riskier and costlier overall. The result is expensive insurance and a large number of people who remain uninsured 鈥 around 40 million before the Affordable Care Act. (Alan Green, 1/10)

This is part of the Morning Briefing, a summary of health policy coverage from major news organizations. Sign up for an email subscription.
Newsletter icon

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Stay informed by signing up for the Morning Briefing and other emails:

Recent Morning Briefings

  • Today, April 29
  • Tuesday, April 28
  • Monday, April 27
  • Friday, April 24
  • Thursday, April 23
  • Wednesday, April 22
More Morning Briefings
RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
  • Special Reports
  • Morning Briefing
  • About Us
  • Republish Our Content
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

  • RSS

Sign up for emails

Join our email list for regular updates based on your personal preferences.

Sign up
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy

漏 2026 麻豆女优