Morning Briefing
Summaries of health policy coverage from major news organizations
Public Option Could Let Clinton Tap Into Sanders Supporters' Health Care Enthusiasm
Bernie Sanders' "Medicare for all" plan seems even less likely now that he's all but out of the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, but there's a way that he and Hillary Clinton could still find common ground on government-sponsored health care. It's a "public option" for states to set up their own insurance plans that compete against private industry. Sanders helped to pass the federal legislation that would allow it, and Clinton, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, says if elected she'd work with interested governors to implement it. (Alonso-Zaldivar and Gram, 6/20)
[A] new ad features a 1998 clip of Hillary Clinton speaking about the Children鈥檚 Health Insurance Program (CHIP) signed into law by her husband, then-President Bill Clinton. The ad is an interesting example of how images and words can be assembled to present an image of leadership, while giving a misleading impression about what exactly happened. ... Given the facts about CHIP and the reporting at the time, you could assemble a somewhat less favorable account about Clinton鈥檚 role in creating CHIP. The ad is correct that about 8 million low-income children receive health care through the program. But it鈥檚 questionable that she played a key leadership role to creating CHIP. (Kessler, 6/20)
Hillary Clinton鈥檚 health plans show a willingness to take on industry groups to shift costs away from consumers, health care experts on both the right and the left agree. They also say that the Affordable Care Act laid the foundation for Clinton鈥檚 consumer-centered proposals. Everything becomes simpler after that major health overhaul. ... Clinton鈥檚 general support of the Obama administration鈥檚 Medicare drug reimbursement plan may be her most controversial policy stance, and it has real implications should she become president. (Many of her other policy ideas would require Congress鈥檚 support, which is far from guaranteed should Republicans retain control of either the House or the Senate.) (Owens, 6/20)