Morning Briefing
Summaries of health policy coverage from major news organizations
Viewpoints: RFK Jr. 'Reviewed The Science' And Got It Wrong; Stem Cell IVF Will Open Pandora's Box
When Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. terminated $500 million in federal funding for mRNA vaccine research last week, claiming he had 鈥渞eviewed the science,鈥 his press release linked to a 181-page document as justification. I reviewed Kennedy鈥檚 鈥渆vidence.鈥 It doesn鈥檛 support ending mRNA vaccine development. It makes the case for expanding it. (Jake Scott, 8/13)
On first glance, the data that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. cited to justify canceling some $500 million in federal grants for mRNA vaccine research looked impressive. The data, according to the agency, were embodied in some 400 research papers listed in a compilation that ran to 181 pages. The document was headlined 鈥淐OVID-19 mRNA 鈥榲accine鈥 harms research collection.鈥 (Michael Hiltzik, 8/12)
David Wallace-Wells, a writer for Times Opinion, talks with the economist Emily Oster about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.鈥檚 policy priorities as secretary of health and human services and what the changes he鈥檚 wrought 鈥 from canceling mRNA vaccine research to phasing out food dyes 鈥 mean for our health. (Emily Oster and David Wallace-Wells, 8/13)
Japanese regulators just quietly gave researchers there a historic OK to generate human embryos from stem cells in the lab 鈥 no ovaries or testes needed. Scientists in Japan and around the world are quickly working toward making viable human eggs and sperm from stem cells, a process called in vitro gametogenesis, or IVG. Those stem cell-derived sperm and eggs could be used for vitro fertilization (IVF) to generate human embryos for research or, one day, making babies. Let鈥檚 call the potential new process stem cell IVF. (Paul Knoepfler, 8/13)
Some time ago, I discovered an online calculator meant to help heart surgeons determine patients鈥 chances of complications or death. Surprisingly, the calculator, based on published studies, is not password-protected. A patient willing to wade through a thicket of technical terms could use the information in their electronic health record to manually fill in the needed numbers and discover their surgical risk. (Michael L. Millenson, 8/13)