Well-Intentioned Scientists Race To Find Cures, But Rush For Answers Could Backfire
Researchers may be duplicating each other's efforts and working at cross-purposes in the chaotic scientific blitz taking place all over the globe. Meanwhile, Fox News hosts, who touted the malaria drug as a COVID-19 treatment, now go silent after scientific evidence shows it might not live up to the hype.
As many of the most forward-thinking tech and biopharma behemoths 鈥 from Apple and Google to Gilead and MIT 鈥 rush in to use their savvy and expertise to help fight Covid-19, some of their independent efforts risk undermining their common goals. For all the know-how and good intentions of these institutions, responding to a global pandemic is far different than operating in the private sector. In interviews with STAT, several researchers and technology experts said that instead of collaborating and seeding innovation, some groups are effectively duplicating each other鈥檚 work or competing for limited resources 鈥 which could stymie progress in the pandemic response, the experts warned. (Brodwin and Robbins, 4/23)
Scientists in the Sacramento area believe they have developed a way to keep the new coronavirus from finding the doorknob that it typically turns to enter human lung cells. Chris Xu, the CEO of Rancho Cordova-based ThermoGenesis, said the biopharmaceutical treatment could go to market within two months. (Anderson, 4/22)
For a month鈥檚 stretch, the Fox News star Laura Ingraham relentlessly promoted the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine to her nearly four million nightly viewers. The drug was 鈥渁 game changer鈥 in the fight against the coronavirus, the conservative anchor declared. She booked recovered patients to describe their 鈥渕iracle turnaround鈥 鈥 鈥渓ike Lazarus, up from the grave,鈥 as Ms. Ingraham put it. Anyone who questioned the drug鈥檚 efficacy, she said, was 鈥渋n total denial.鈥 (Grynbaum, 4/22)
At the height of Fox News鈥檚 coverage of a would-be treatment for the novel coronavirus, the network鈥檚 medical correspondent, Marc Siegel, offered a remarkable testimonial during Tucker Carlson鈥檚 show. Siegel said his 96-year-old father, suffering from symptoms of the virus and fearing he would die, made a full recovery thanks to the drug, hydroxychloroquine, and a course of antibiotics. 鈥淗e got up the next day and was fine,鈥 Siegel told an astonished Carlson. (Farhi and Izadi, 4/22)
President Donald Trump鈥檚 push to put hydroxychloroquine at the forefront of his administration鈥檚 coronavirus strategy may be quieting down, but one of his biggest proxies in New Jersey is keeping up the fight. 鈥淣ot only do I read the stories, I read the studies,鈥 state Sen. Joseph Pennacchio, who is co-chairman of Trump鈥檚 2020 campaign in New Jersey, told POLITICO on Wednesday. 鈥淭he internet is a wonderful place,鈥 he added, saying he鈥檚 discussed the issue with physicians. (Sutton, 4/23)
In what's described as the largest study of its kind, New York researchers have submitted to the state health department preliminary results of their work looking at hydroxychloroquine, the drug President Trump has touted as a "game changer" in the fight against coronavirus. "We have reviewed several hundred medical records of Covid patients at this point in over 20 hospitals and done a preliminary analysis," David Holtgrave, the lead researcher, said Wednesday. Doctors and patients anxiously await the results of studies like this one to guide them toward the most effective therapies for Covid-19. (Cohen, 4/22)
President Trump has pushed a malaria drug, hydroxychloroquine, as a treatment for coronavirus patients. A recent study found that patients taking it had higher death rates compared with those who did not. (4/22)