�鶹Ů��

Hundreds of workers at the National Institutes of Health — the largest public funder of biomedical research in the world — are openly protesting the Trump administration’s policies regarding the agency, saying the upheaval and harm being done to the institution is so great that they felt they had no choice.

sent June 9 to agency director Jay Bhattacharya, signed by more than 300 current or former workers — including more than a quarter who signed their names publicly — is an extraordinary rebuke of the Trump administration’s actions against the NIH this year. And that is no small list. They include terminating hundreds of grants funding scientific and biomedical research across the country, firing more than 1,000 employees, tanking funding for young scientists, and moving to end billions in funds to partner research institutions overseas, a move current and former NIH workers say will harm work to combat rare cancers and infectious diseases, among other research. 

“It’s been soul-crushing,” said one NIH worker who signed the letter, whom �鶹Ů�� Health News agreed not to name because they are not authorized to speak to the press and fear retaliation. “This matters for everyone who has ever been sick or knows anyone who has.” 

Bhattacharya received the letter — which he said “has some fundamental misconceptions about the policy directions the NIH has taken in recent months” — a day before testifying in front of a Senate subcommittee about the Trump White House’s budget proposal for the NIH. That proposal seeks to slash the agency’s funding by 40% and collapse its 27 institutes and centers into eight. And it made for some fireworks with lawmakers, particularly Democrats, who lodged numerous complaints. 

“What the Trump administration is doing to NIH right now is, frankly, catastrophic,” Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said at the Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing June 10. 

Bhattacharya said that the budget “is a collaboration” with Congress, making it clear that the White House’s proposal is far from set in stone. But he also took responsibility for specific actions the administration has taken without congressional involvement. Asked by Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) who is making decisions to withhold grant funding, Bhattacharya said, “I’ve made those decisions” to “move away from politicized science.” 

In a town hall meeting with NIH employees in May, a recording of which �鶹Ů�� Health News obtained, Bhattacharya contended that certain NIH-supported research focused on racial and ethnic minorities is “ideological in nature, and that doesn’t advance the health and well-being of anybody” — a characterization that NIH workers dispute. 

“They’re actually doing the very thing that they say they’re not doing,” one worker said, “and cutting whole areas of science that are critical to understanding how to improve patient care and patient outcomes.”

We’d like to speak with current and former personnel from the Department of Health and Human Services or its component agencies who believe the public should understand the impact of what’s happening within the federal health bureaucracy. Please message �鶹Ů�� Health News on Signal at (415) 519-8778 or .

Related Topics

• Health Industry
• Public Health
• Agency Watch
• HHS
• NIH
• The Week in Brief
• Trump Administration

Contact Us Submit a Story Tip