It was a well-intentioned effort to provide men with some of the same financial protection from birth control costs that women get. But a new Maryland law may jeopardize the ability of thousands of consumers 鈥 both men and women 鈥 to use health savings accounts.
The law, which took effect Jan. 1, mandates that insurers cover vasectomies without requiring patients to pay anything out-of-pocket 鈥 just as they must do for more than a dozen birth control methods for women.
But the measure may run afoul of Internal Revenue Service rules that do not include vasectomies among approved preventive services for high-deductible health plans. People with health savings accounts 鈥 which are exempt from tax liabilities 鈥 tied to those plans could no longer contribute to the savings accounts in that case.
Under the ,聽insurers generally can鈥檛 charge patients a copayment or require any other cost sharing for prescription contraceptive drugs or devices approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The 2016 law is similar to what鈥檚 required under the federal Affordable Care Act, with a twist: It adds male sterilization 鈥 鈥 to the list of services that are free for patients.
鈥淲hile the ACA made important strides 鈥 it completely left men out of the equation,鈥 said Karen Nelson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Maryland, whose organization supported the bill.
Before the law took effect, a vasectomy at the organization鈥檚 Baltimore office would cost between $225 and $1,100, depending on someone鈥檚 ability to pay, said Nelson. Now the procedure will generally cost nothing for men in insured plans in Maryland.
The state law doesn鈥檛 apply to companies that are 鈥渟elf-funded,鈥 meaning they pay their employees鈥 health care claims directly rather than buying state-regulated insurance policies.
Under IRS rules, consumers making tax-free contributions to health savings accounts (HSAs) that are linked to high-deductible health plans have to pay for all their medical care until they reach their deductible of at least in 2018. The only exception is for preventive services.聽The hitch for the Maryland law is that vasectomies aren鈥檛 on the IRS .
The IRS hasn鈥檛 responded to a by Maryland Insurance Commissioner Al Redmer Jr.聽A this year 鈥 after it failed to pass last year 鈥 that would exempt these high-deductible plans from the state mandate to cover vasectomies before the deductible is met. Such a move would preserve the tax advantages of the HSAs linked to them.
Maryland is joining a few other states, including , Vermont and, starting next year, , that have expanded contraceptive coverage without cost sharing to include male sterilization.
Vermont鈥檚 law includes language to exempt high-deductible plans with health savings accounts. While the issue has raised concerns in Maryland, in Illinois and Oregon it hasn鈥檛 appeared to generate much attention to date, legislative analysts say.
Some advocates for extending no-cost coverage to vasectomies noted that the IRS鈥 list of approved preventive services specifically says that it isn鈥檛 exhaustive.
But until the issue is clarified, 鈥渢he safest thing to do is not make a contribution to your HSA,鈥 said , a Maryland resident and president of HSA Consulting Services.聽Ramthun helped implement health savings accounts while working for the Treasury Department during the George W. Bush administration. He stressed that the uncertainty applies only to HSA contributions made after the law became effective in 2018, not to earlier contributions. The issue doesn鈥檛 affect people鈥檚 medical coverage.
Beyond the uncertainty around health savings account contributions, Maryland鈥檚 law requiring coverage of vasectomies without cost sharing addresses a gap in men鈥檚 preventive coverage.
鈥淭here are arguments to be made that male condoms and vasectomies have preventive benefits for both women and men, in terms of [sexually transmitted infection] prevention and preventing pregnancy,鈥 said Mara Gandal-Powers, senior counsel at the National Women鈥檚 Law Center.
Seven percent of men ages 18 to 45 have had a vasectomy, according to a by researchers at Northwestern University. The prevalence increased to 16 percent among men ages 36 to 45. Men with higher incomes, higher education and a regular source of health care were more likely to have had the procedure, the study found.
The Maryland law doesn鈥檛 apply to the method of birth control that many men use: condoms. A by state Sen. John Astle, a Democrat, would expand the law to include condom coverage.
